Stagflation is a great example of how real-world experience can run roughshod over widely accepted economic theories and policy prescriptions. Coryanne Hicks is an investing and personal finance journalist specializing in women and millennial investors. Previously, she was a fully licensed financial professional at Fidelity Investments where she helped clients make more informed financial decisions every day. She has ghostwritten financial guidebooks for industry professionals and even a personal memoir. She is passionate about improving financial literacy and believes a little education can go a long way.

Meanwhile, a contracting economy with lots of spare capacity restrains price hikes and wage increases as demand slows. “After surging in 2020 on government income support for the COVID shock, the U.S. broad money supply is falling for the first time since the late 1940s,” Wieting says. For example, they cite surging energy costs or food costs as the root cause of the economic problems of stagflation.

When mergers and acquisitions are no longer politically feasible (governments clamp down with anti-monopoly rules), stagflation is used as an alternative to have higher relative profit than the competition. With increasing mergers and acquisitions, the power to implement stagflation increases. The explanation for the shift of the Phillips curve gartley pattern definition was initially provided by the monetarist economist Milton Friedman, and also by Edmund Phelps. Both argued that when workers and firms begin to expect more inflation, the Phillips curve shifts up (meaning that more inflation occurs at any given level of unemployment). In particular, they suggested that if inflation lasted for several years, workers and firms would start to take it into account during wage negotiations, causing workers’ wages and firms’ costs to rise more quickly, thus further increasing inflation.

Most consumers don’t feel there is ‘growth’ of 7.1% because real wages have been squeezed by rising prices. Therefore, it may feel like stagflation to many consumers even it economic stats don’t show classic stagflation. Since that time, inflation has proved to be persistent even during periods of slow or negative economic growth. In the past 50 years, every declared recession in the U.S. has seen a continuous, year-over-year rise in consumer price levels.

We and our partners process data to provide:

For example, an easy monetary policy where interest rates are being lowered combined with a tight fiscal policy can lead to wage retaliation if taxes remain too high. As workers demand higher wages, businesses may reduce employment and pass the higher costs onto consumers by raising prices. Today’s U.S. it-security specialist economy does look much better than that of the 1970s, according to most data. Stagflation, or recession-inflation, is an economic phenomenon marked by persistent high inflation, high unemployment, and stagnant demand in a country’s economy. Inflation is a singular phenomenon that can have multiple causes and many inflationary episodes don’t fit neatly into one of the categories above. For example, the increase in inflation in 2021 and 2022 reflected the demand-pull effect of the fiscal stimulus in U.S. pandemic relief legislation, as well as the cost-push of supply chain disruptions, including sharply higher shipping costs.

What Is Stagflation, What Causes It, and Why Is It Bad?

1. Today’s U.S. economy does look much better than that of the 1970s, according to most data.
2. In the decades since, there hasn’t been a time when those three factors—high inflation, slow economic growth, and a rapid rise in unemployment—occurred simultaneously and for a prolonged period.
3. With increasing mergers and acquisitions, the power to implement stagflation increases.
4. As workers demand higher wages, businesses may reduce employment and pass the higher costs onto consumers by raising prices.
5. The Federal Reserve deems annual inflation averaging 2% over the long run most consistent with its mandates of stable prices and maximum employment because that keeps the much more dangerous deflation at bay while supporting economic growth.

Since recessions are more common than periods of stagflation, there are macroeconomic tools developed that help nations fight recessions. Stagflation occurs much less often, so it is considered a worse condition because standard recessionary tools are ineffective. The failure to forecast, avoid, and contain stagflation once it occurs suggests that the exact forces creating it are not yet known. During the 1970s, stagflation persisted in the U.S. despite the government’s best efforts to quell it. The trend was finally interrupted when the Federal Reserve raised interest rates to the point where borrowing was impossible for many segments of the economy, and the country fell into a deep recession. In the 1970s, economist Arthur Okun developed an index to measure stagflation that is calculated by adding the unemployment rate to the annual inflation rate.

Alternative views

The wage-price spiral, sometimes also called wage-push inflation or built-in inflation, describes instances when rising wages and prices reinforce each other, with higher prices driving wage increases which then result in still higher prices. The wage-price spiral is what can happen when policymakers fail to bring inflation under control. In the decades since, there hasn’t been a time when those three factors—high inflation, slow economic growth, and a rapid rise in unemployment—occurred simultaneously and for a prolonged period. A long-lasting surge in prices has been quite rare in modern history and until this year, the inflation rate hadn’t been above 5% for 6 months or more since the 1980s.

Stagflation in the post-pandemic economy?

The causes of stagflation during that period remain in dispute, as did the likelihood of a reprise in 2022 amid high energy and food prices, rising interest rates, and persistent supply-chain snags. Stagflation is a term used to describe a stagnant economy hampered not only by slow growth but by high inflation as well. While this combination may seem counterintuitive, it proved real during the 1970s and early 1980s when workers in the U.S. and Europe were subjected to high unemployment as well as the loss of purchasing power. In the 1970s, the US experienced a sharp rise in inflation due to the pressure of rising oil prices. The term stagflation combines the words “stagnant” and “inflation.” Its first use is attributed to a British politician in the 1960s.

He says that’s because the economy is fundamentally different today than it was back then. While the U.S. has sidestepped another bout of stagflation since the 1970s, some commentators have drawn parallels between that episode and recent dynamics in the economy. While it’s unlikely that the U.S. economy is headed for another bout of stagflation, it’s important to contextualize what’s happening with the prominent episode of stagflation in the 1970s. Nixon removed the last indirect vestiges of the gold standard, bringing down the Bretton Woods system that had controlled currency exchange rates.

Stagflation is a double whammy of economic woes that combines lethargic economic growth (and, typically, high unemployment) with escalating inflation. It’s also a conundrum for fiscal and monetary policymakers, as it turns the Phillips curve on its head. Although the U.S. eventually overcame the stagflation scourge of the 1970s—after a decade of economic doldrums—the causes of stagflation and the best solution for overcoming it remain a matter of debate. The de facto consensus on stagflation among most economists and policymakers has been to essentially redefine what they mean by the term inflation in the era of modern currency and financial systems. Persistently rising price levels and falling purchasing power—i.e., inflation—are just normal conditions of good and bad Chande momentum oscillator economic times.

One obstacle in the way of a stagflationary re-rerun is the modern global economy’s significantly reduced dependence on energy to generate growth. Others include the historically large U.S. budget deficit, interest-rate increases by the Federal Reserve, and modest inflation expectations shaped by decades of low inflation. The traditional Phillips curve suggests there is a trade-off between inflation and unemployment. A period of stagflation will shift the Phillips curve to the right, giving a worse trade-off. When weighing big purchasing decisions—like a car, for example—consider whether you can defer or delay the purchase of items where prices may be temporarily elevated, he adds.

As a result, prices rise in response to expansionary monetary policy without any corresponding decrease in unemployment, while unemployment rates rise or fall based on real economic shocks to the economy. Supply shocks can also be caused by labor restrictions which reduce output and raise unemployment and wages while causing prices to rise as businesses push the higher costs of labor onto consumers. As we normally understand the economic cycle, economic growth comes with an increase in jobs and, eventually, a rise in the price of goods and services, aka inflation. (The Fed’s target for “healthy” inflation is around 2%.) In contrast, when the economy slows, the job market begins to contract, and inflation also cools. It seems like a simple solution—lowering/raising interest rates to stimulate or slow down the economy, as if all the central bank has to do is flip a switch.

On the one hand, housing prices (and average rent prices) rose on an annualized basis, but many cities and states implemented eviction moratoriums (meaning you couldn’t evict tenants who weren’t able to pay their rent). In 1980, the Federal Reserve, led by chair Paul Volcker, raised the Fed funds rate to as high as 21%. This led to a painful 16-month recession and spike in the unemployment rate to 10.8%. Considering that stagflation is such an unusual and puzzling condition, there’s no guarantee that such an austerity fix would produce the same results in another stagflationary situation.